-FHM LaCour v. Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority et al, No. 4:2011cv00089 - Document 36 (N.D. Okla. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy ; denying 33 Motion for Hearing (jcm, Dpty Clk) Modified on 8/10/2011 to correct event (tjc, Dpty Clk).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TORANCE W. LACOUR, PLAINTIFF, vs. METROPOLITAN TULSA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, and several unnamed employees, DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 11-CV-89-TCK-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff s Motion for Scheduling Conference [Dkt. 33] is before the Court for consideration. Plaintiff seeks a hearing to resolve issues related to the entry of a scheduling order in the case. Based upon the Joint Status Report [Dkt. 30], Plaintiff s Request for Extension of Time [Dkt. 31] and the current motion, the Court has sufficient information to enter a scheduling order without a hearing. Plaintiff s Motion for Scheduling Conference [Dkt. 33] is therefore DENIED and a scheduling order will be entered. SO ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2011.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
