Blissit et al v. Westlake Hardware, Inc et al, No. 4:2009cv00058 - Document 23 (N.D. Okla. 2009)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy 21 Plaintiff Joe Richard Blissit's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Motion to Compel Discover is denied ; denying 17 Motion to Compel (jcm, Dpty Clk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JOE RICHARD BLISSIT, and LYNNE JOYCE BLISSIT, PLAINTIFF, vs. WESTLAKE HARDWARE, INC., DEFENDANT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 09-CV-58-TCK-FHM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant s Motion to Compel Supplemental Responses to First Interrogatories to Plaintiff, Joe Richard Blissit; and Motion to Compel a Privilege Log and/or Production of Documents [Dkt. 17] is before the Court for decision. Plaintiff did not file a response to Defendant s motion, but instead filed a Motion to Dismiss Defendant s Motion to Compel Discovery [Dkt. 21]; that motion is also before the Court. Defendant seeks to compel certain discovery. Plaintiff contends Defendant s motion should be dismissed because Defendant has not complied with the meet and confer requirements of L.Cv.R. 37.1. In reply, Defendant contends that the requirements of L.Cv.R. 37.1 have been met. [Dkt. 22] Both parties attach copies of correspondence in support of their contentions as to whether a meet and confer occurred. The Court will not expend its resources resolving the meet and confer issue. Instead, counsel are hereby ordered to personally meet, face-to-face, and to make a good faith, sincere attempt to resolve their discovery differences. If issues remain after the personal meeting, either party may file appropriate motions. Defendant s Motion to Compel Supplemental Responses to First Interrogatories to Plaintiff, Joe Richard Blissit; and Motion to Compel a Privilege Log and/or Production of Documents [Dkt. 17] is DENIED. Plaintiff Joe Richard Blissit s Motion to Dismiss Defendant s Motion to Compel Discovery [Dkt. 21] is DENIED. SO ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2009. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.