Yocheved et al v. Tel Aviv-UNHCR, No. 6:2013cv00287 - Document 8 (E.D. Okla. 2013)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay denying 6 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (neh, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ADONAI YOCHEVED, Plaintiff, v. SASHA YOCHEVED, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV 13-287-FHS OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL The court has treated the pleading filed on July 31, 2013, as a motion requesting the court to appoint counsel [Docket No. 6]. Plaintiff bears the burden of convincing the court that her claim has sufficient merit to warrant appointment of counsel. McCarthy v. Weinberg, 753 F.2d 836, 838 (10th Cir. 1985) (citing United States v. Masters, 484 F.2d 1251, 1253 (10th Cir. 1973)). The court has carefully reviewed the merits of plaintiff s claims, the nature of factual issues raised in her allegations, and her ability to investigate crucial facts. McCarthy, 753 F.2d at 838 (citing Maclin v. Freake, 650 F.2d 885, 887-88 (7th Cir. 1981)). After considering plaintiff s ability to present her claims and the complexity of the legal issues raised by the claims, the court finds that appointment of counsel is not warranted. See Williams v. Meese, 926 F.2d 994, 996 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Rucks v. Boergermann, 57 F.3d 978, 979 (10th Cir. 1995). ACCORDINGLY, plaintiff s motion [Docket No.6] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of August 2013.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.