Cole v. Grace et al, No. 6:2012cv00435 - Document 6 (E.D. Okla. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White: This action 1s, m all respects, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TilLED JAN - 9 2013 WILLIAM B. GUTHRIE OMAR H. COLE, Plaintiff, KEN GRACE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Clerk, U.S. Dl1trtot Court By OepufY dlifR No. CIV 12-435-RAW-SPS OPINION AND ORDER On October 22, 20 12, plaintiff filed this complaint with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The motion was granted on November 20, 2012, and he was directed to pay an initial partial filing fee within twenty days. On November 26, 2012, plaintiff's copy of the order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis was returned to the court with the notation that p1aintiffwas "gone." He has made no further contact with the court. Plaintiff has failed to advise the court of his current address, as required by Local Civil Rule 5.5(a). Therefore, this action is dismissed for failure to prosecute. See United States ex rel. Jimenez v. Health Net, Inc., 400 F .3d 853, 854-56 (1Oth Cir. 2005) (dismissing appeal sua sponte for failure to prosecute because appellant disappeared and failed to meet court deadlines). ACCORDINGLY, this action 1s, m all respects, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED this tJfr day of January 2013. RONALDA:WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
