Berryman v. Social Security Administration, No. 6:2010cv00428 - Document 23 (E.D. Okla. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay : The Findings and Recommendations suggest that the case be REVERSED AND REMANDED for further administrative proceedings.This Court finds the Findings of the Magistrate Judge applied the proper standards and documents numerous references to the record which support the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the Secretary's decision be REVERSED AND REMANDED. 22 Report and Recommendation (acg, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
Berryman v. Social Security Administration Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JOSHUA BERRYMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) CIV-10-428-FHS-SPS 1 ORDER On March 13, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge for this District filed Findings and Recommendations in this case. No objection was filed so the Findings are deemed confessed. The Findings and Recommendations suggest that the case be REVERSED AND REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. This Court finds the Findings of the Magistrate Judge applied the proper standards and documents numerous references to the record which support the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the Secretary's decision be REVERSED AND REMANDED. Upon consideration of the entire record and the issues herein, this Court finds and orders that the Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge be SUSTAINED and adopted by this Court as this Court's Findings and Order. Accordingly, this case is REVERSED AND REMANDED to the 1 On February 14, 2013, Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Ms. Colvin is substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the Defendant in this action. Dockets.Justia.com defendant under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. ยง405(g) for proceedings consistent with this order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2013.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.