Henning v. Union Pacific RR, No. 6:2004cv00044 - Document 279 (E.D. Okla. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER by Mag. Judge Kimberly E. West that Defendant's Motion for New Trial based upon the admission of Shockey's age and lack of permission to use the vehicle on the day of the collision is DENIED under the prevailing standard. (neh, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
Henning v. Union Pacific RR Doc. 279 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.