Hurley v. Court of Claims of Ohio et al, No. 3:2020cv00448 - Document 4 (S.D. Ohio 2020)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Report and Recommendations docketed on November 5, 2020 3 is ADOPTED in full, Plaintiff's Complaint 2 is dismissed; and the case remains terminated on the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-4-2020. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hurley v. Court of Claims of Ohio et al Doc. 4 Case: 3:20-cv-00448-TMR-SLO Doc #: 4 Filed: 12/04/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON : : Plaintiff, : : vs. : : COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO, et al., : : Defendants. : VENESSA HURLEY, Case No. 3:20-cv-00448 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (ECF No. 3), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on November 5, 2020 (ECF No. 3) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 2) is dismissed; and 3. The case remains terminated on the Court’s docket. December 4, 2020 *s/Thomas M. Rose Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
