Mathews v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, No. 3:2012cv00314 - Document 29 (S.D. Ohio 2013)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT NOV ARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE CAUSATION TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS (DOC. #[8-22]); SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPOR ATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #[8-19]); SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION'S DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS DR. SUZANNE PARISIAN, DR. ROBERT MARX, DR. ROBERT FLETCHER, PROFESSOR WAYNE RAY, DR. KEITH SKUBITZ, AND DR. JAMES VOGEL (DOC. #[8-18]). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 10/24/13. (pb1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ALVIN MATHEWS, Plaintiff, Case No. 3: 12-cv-314 v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, JUDGE WALTER H. RICE Defendant. DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT NOV ARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE CAUSATION TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS (DOC. #8-22); SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #8-19); SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION'S DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS DR. SUZANNE PARISIAN, DR. ROBERT MARX, DR. ROBERT FLETCHER, PROFESSOR WAYNE RAY, DR. KEITH SKUBITZ, AND DR. JAMES VOGEL (DOC. #8-18) Plaintiff Alvin Mathews filed suit against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation ("NPC"), alleging that he developed osteonecrosis of the jaw ("ONJ") after being infused with Aredia® and lometa®, nitrogenous bisphosphonate drugs manufactured and marketed by NPC. His Amended Complaint asserts three claims under the Ohio Products Liability Act ("OPLA "), Ohio Revised Code § 2307.71, et seq., for design defect, inadequate warning, and nonconformance with manufacturer's representation. Doc. # 26.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.