Hill v. Rastatter et al, No. 3:2012cv00173 - Document 18 (S.D. Ohio 2013)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 16 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. 17 ) OVERRULED; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(4) (DOC. 15 ). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 3/8/2013. (sc1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON ALPHONZO H. HILL, Case No. 3:12-cv-173 Plaintiff, District Judge Walter H. Rice Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman vs. DOUGLAS M. RASTATTER, eta/., Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #16) IN ITS ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #17) OVERRULED; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(4) (DOC. #15) Based upon the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by the United States Magistrate Judge, in his Report and Recommendation, filed February 25, 2013 (Doc. #16), as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, this Court adopts the aforesaid Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and overrules Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. #17) thereto. Plaintiffs motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) (Doc. #15) is denied. The above captioned case shall remain terminated upon the Court's docket. March _8_, 2013 WALTER HERBERT RICE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
