Converset v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2012cv00020 - Document 14 (S.D. Ohio 2013)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 2. The Commissioner's decision is vacated; 3. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Shelley Converset was under a "disability" wit hin the meaning of the Social Security Act: 4. Judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is remanded to the Social Security Administration under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendations, and this Decision and Entry: and 5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 03/12/2013. (pb1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON SHELLEY CONVERSET, : Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:12cv00020 vs. : CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #13), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on February 21, 2013 (Doc. #13) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner s decision is vacated; 3. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Shelley Converset was under a disability within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 4. Judgment is entered in Plaintiff s favor and this case is remanded to the Social Security Administration under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendations, and this Decision and Entry; and, 5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. 3/12/2013 s/Thomas M. Rose Judge Thomas M. Rose United States District Court 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
