Boden v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2011cv00321 - Document 22 (S.D. Ohio 2013)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 20 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY AND GRANTING THE JOINT STIPULATION TO ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (DOC. 21 ) - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the joint stipulation for an EAJA fees and costs award (Doc. 20 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff is AWARDED the sum of 2,900.59 in EAJA feesand costs. This case remains TERMINATED upon the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3/18/2013. (sc1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON MELISSA BODEN, : Case No. 3:11-cv-321 : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, : Defendant. : ______________________________________________________________________________ DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #21) IN ITS ENTIRETY AND GRANTING THE JOINT STIPULATION TO ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (DOC. #20) ____________________________________________________________________________ The Court has reviewed the February 25, 2013 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #21), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the joint stipulation for an EAJA fees and costs award (Doc. #20) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff is AWARDED the sum of $2,900.59 in EAJA fees and costs. This case remains TERMINATED upon the Court s docket. Date: March 18, 2013 s/Thomas M. Rose THOMAS M. ROSE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
