Conway v. Warden London Correctional Facility, No. 3:2010cv00150 - Document 11 (S.D. Ohio 2011)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on November 28, 2011 (Doc. # 10 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. David Conways Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. # 3 ) is DENIED and DISMISSED; 3. Petitioner is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability is DENIED; and 4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12/28/11. (pb1)

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DAVID CONWAY, : Petitioner, : : -vsWARDEN, London Correctional Institution, Case No. 3:10cv00150 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : Respondent. : DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #10), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on November 28, 2011 (Doc. #10) is ADOPTED in full; 2. David Conway s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #3) is DENIED and DISMISSED; 3. Petitioner is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability is DENIED; and 4. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. December 28, 2011 *s/THOMAS M. ROSE Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.