Richardson v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al
Filing
36
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING RICHARDSON'S OBJECTIONS 35 TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 34 IN ITS ENTIRETY; AND DENYING RICHARDSON'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO RELEASE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS 33 . Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 10/8/13. (ep)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
EARL RICHARDSON,
Case No. C-3:09-cv-455
Plaintiff,
Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
-vINDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF
OHIO, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING RICHARDSON’S OBJECTIONS
(Doc. #35) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #34) IN ITS ENTIRETY;
AND DENYING RICHARDSON’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO
RELEASE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
______________________________________________________________________________
Pro Se Plaintiff Earl Richardson (“Richardson”) has filed a Motion for an Order To
Release Compensation and Benefits. (Doc. #33.) On September 3, 2013, Magistrate Judge
Michael R. Merz issued a Report and Recommendations recommending that this Motion be
denied for reasons already given in the companion case, Richardson v. Dayton Public Schools,
Case No. 3:10-cv-028, at Docs. #50 and #52. Richardson subsequently objected (doc. #35) and
the time has run and no Defendant has responded to Richardson’s Objection. This matter is,
therefore, ripe for decision.
As required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 72(b), the
District Judge has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court
finds that Richardson’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations are
not well-taken, and they are hereby OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendations is adopted in its entirety. Richardson’s Motion for an Order To Release
Compensation and Benefits (doc. #33) is denied.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Eighth Day of October, 2013.
s/Thomas M. Rose
_______________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record
Earl Richardson at his last address of record
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
