Svete v. Wunderlich et al, No. 3:2009cv00357 - Document 173 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's objection to 168 the Order of the Magistrate Judge, but grants Plaintiff until 8/21/09 to provide the supplemental responses directed by the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has requested an extension of time 171 to respond to discovery requests, the Court grants Plaintiff until 8/21/09 to respond. The Court denies without prejudice 166 and 167 Defendants' motions for sanctions and dismissal for failure to make timely response to defendants' discovery requests. Plaintiff's motion to bifurcate 170 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal at a later date of the proceedings. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/03/09. (dh)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.