United States Of America v. Powell et al, No. 3:2009cv00045 - Document 62 (S.D. Ohio 2011)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT STAR BANK (DOC. # 38 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION OF DEFENDANT IRENE HALL TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO DORSET PROPERTY (DOC. # 40 ); DECISI ON AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART, OVERRULING AS MOOT IN PART AND NOT RULING UPON IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 42 ); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION OF DEFENDANT IRENE HALL TO ISSUE SUBPOENA (DOC. # 49 ); DECISION A ND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. # 50 ); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION OF DEFENDANT IRENE HALL TO FILE PROOFS OF PAYMENT (DOC. # 51 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION OF DEFENDANT IRENE HALL TO REJECT NON-ASSERT ION OF LAND CONTRACT (DOC. # 52 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION OF DEFENDANT IRENE HALL TO DISMISS (DOC. # 56 ); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO WALES PROPERTY (DOC. # 58 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION OF DEFENDANT IRENE HALL FOR FACE TO FACE MEETING WITH JUDGE RICE (DOC. # 59 ); FINDING OFNO JUST CASE FOR DELAY MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 54 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE; PLAINTIFF DIRECTED TO FILE FORM OF JUDGMENT FOR WEST 5467 THIRD STREET, ALONE, WITHIN TEN DAYS. As a result of the Court's ruling herein, the following motion remains to be resolved, to wit: Government's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 42 ). The Government must file its supplemental request f or summary judgment by January 25,2012. Hall shall file her opposing memorandum no latter than February 21, 2012, within which she must submit the results of the subpoena and proofs of payment, and the Government's reply is due by the close of business February 29, 2012. No extensions of this briefing schedule will be granted. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 12/19/2011. (mdf1)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.