Kline et al v. Mortgage Electronic Security Systems et al, No. 3:2008cv00408 - Document 294 (S.D. Ohio 2013)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY CLARIFYING THE COURT'S DECISION AND ENTRY OF APRIL 19, 2012 (DOC. 271 ); PLAINTIFF EUGENE KLINE'S FDCPA CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS REINSTATED ONLY AS TO SAID PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM UNDER 15 U.S. C. 1692f(1 ); STATE LAW CLAIMS FOR UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND VIOLATION OF THE OHIO CONSUMER SALES PRACTICES ACT OF SAID PLAINTIFF AGAINST SAID DEFENDANTREINSTATED; DEFENDANT LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO PLAI NTIFF KLINE'S CLAIMS (DOC. 277 ) OVERRULED; DEFENDANT LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND TO EXTEND DEADLINES PENDING A DECISION ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. 278 ) OVERRULED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/27/2013. (kf)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.