Barron v. Commissioner Of Social Security, No. 3:2008cv00367 - Document 13 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 (Doc. 12 ); VACATING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING; MAKING NO FINDING AS TO WHETHER PLAINTIFF IS UNDER A "DISABILITY" WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT; REMANDING THE CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.c. 405(g) FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION CONSISTENT WITH THIS DECISION AND ENTRY AND WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; AND TERMINATING THE CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 10/15/09. (cib1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON GARY C. BARRON, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:08cv000367 District Judge Walter Herbert Rice Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 (Doc. #12); VACATING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING; MAKING NO FINDING AS TO WHETHER PLAINTIFF IS UNDER A "DISABILITY" WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT; REMANDING THE CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.c. §405(g) FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION CONSISTENT WITH THIS DECISION AND ENTRY AND WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; AND TERMINATING THE CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT The Court has conducted a de novo review ofthe Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on September 24, 2009 (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is VACATED; 3. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Gary C. Barron was under a "disability" within the meaning ofthe Social Security Act; 4. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the Report and Recommendations; and 5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Walter Herbert Rice United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.