Thomas & Marker Construction Co v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, No. 3:2006cv00406 - Document 249 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

Court Description: ORDER - Considering the parties desire to settle and circumstances of this case, and the entire record, the Court GRANTS the motion: The Courts judgment of January 15, 2009 (Doc. No. 211 ), and its Opinion and Order, and corresponding judgment, of A pril 27, 2009 (Doc. Nos. 230 & 231 ), are hereby VACATED; The pending motion for attorney fees and expenses (Doc. No. 241 ), and any other pending motions, are DENIED AS MOOT, and All claims and counterclaims, of any party, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without any award of costs or fees. This case is closed.. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 07/31/09. (phil1, )

Download PDF
Thomas & Marker Construction Co v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc Doc. 249 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION THOMAS & MARKER CONSTRUCTION CO., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:06-cv-406 Judge Thomas M. Rose ORDER This matter came to be heard upon the joint motion of the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) asking this Court to vacate (1) this Court’s judgment of January 15, 2009 (Doc. No. 211), and (2) its Opinion and Order, and corresponding judgment, of April 27, 2009 (Doc. Nos. 229 & 230). In accordance with their agreement, the parties also ask the Court to deny Plaintiff’s pending motion for attorney fees and expenses (Doc. No. 241) as moot, and dismiss all claims and counterclaims with prejudice. Considering the parties’ desire to settle and circumstances of this case, and the entire record, the Court GRANTS the motion: The Court’s judgment of January 15, 2009 (Doc. No. 211), and its Opinion and Order, and corresponding judgment, of April 27, 2009 (Doc. Nos. 230 & 231), are hereby VACATED; The pending motion for attorney fees and expenses (Doc. No. 241), and any other pending motions, are DENIED AS MOOT; and Dockets.Justia.com All claims and counterclaims, of any party, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without any award of costs or fees. This case is closed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: July 31, 2009 s/Thomas M. Rose Judge Thomas M. Rose -2COI-1425910v2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.