Vehr v. State of Ohio
Filing
10
ORDER adopting 3 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 10/17/13. (jk1)
<![CDATA[
.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Skye H. Vehr,
Plaintiff,
v.
2: 13-cv-684
State of Ohio,
Judge Michael H. Watson
Defendant.
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Abel screened this pro se § 1983 case under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2) and issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") which
recommended granting Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis but
recommended dismissing the complaint due to sovereign immunity. R&R 1, ECF
No.3.
Plaintiff objects to the R&R arguing: (1) her complaint was misfiled, as it
was supposed to be filed in the "Federal Federal Court, Not in the DISTRICT
Court," (2) the inclusion of a Magistrate Judge amounts to undue process, (3)
Plaintiff wants to overturn sovereign immunity in this case, (4) Plaintiff states
cognizable claims under the Ungovernable Action Statute; (5) sovereign
immunity has been overturned in at least one case, (6) if there is a filing error, the
Magistrate Judge should have notified Plaintiff.
•
The Court has considered Plaintiff's objections and finds them meritless.
The Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objections, ADOPTS the R&R, and
DISMISSES the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ICHAEL H. 'A SON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
