Harris v. Nink et al
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 Complaint: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the action be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 10/8/2013. (er1)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
DWAYNE HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Civil Action 2:13-cv-304
Judge Graham
Magistrate Judge King
CARL NINK, et al.,
Defendants.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff was ordered to pay the full $350.00 filing fee by
October 7, 2013 if he wished to pursue this action.
11.
Order, Doc. No.
Plaintiff has not paid the full filing fee.
It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the action be dismissed for
failure to prosecute.
If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report
and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file
and serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation,
specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part
thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto.
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
28
Response to objections
must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy
thereof.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to
the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to
de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the
decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation.
See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of
Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States
v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
October 8, 2013
s/Norah McCann King_______
Norah McCann King
United States Magistrate Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
