R & D Film 1, LLC v. Does 1-84
Filing
9
ORDER adopting the Report and Recommendations, the cases are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 10/1/13. (jk1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
R&D Film 1, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case Nos. 2:12-cv-1112;
2:12-cv-1113; 2:12-cv-1115;
2:12-cv-1116; 2:12-cv-1117;
2: 12-cv-1120; 2: 12-cv-1136;
2:12-cv-1137; 2:12-cv-1138;
2:12-cv-1139;
Judge Michael H. Watson
John Does,
Defendants.
ORDER
On August 21, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers filed
Reports and Recommendations ("R&R") concerning the disposition of R&D Film
1, LLC's ("Plaintiff') Complaint in these cases. The R&Rs recommended
dismissing these actions without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process.
The R&Rs notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&Rs
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
The R&Rs further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the
R&Rs within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review
by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgments of the
District Court. Report and Recommendation 2, ECF No. 8. The deadline for
filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&Rs are ADOPTED, and the cases
are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment and
terminate these cases.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
~/l!k
M'iCHAELH:WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?