Gibbs v. Philadelphia Police Department et al, No. 2:2012cv00017 - Document 34 (S.D. Ohio 2013)

Court Description: ORDER: Detective Wojciehowski, the only defendant remaining in this action, filed a motion to dismiss on 12/12/12. Plaintiff was granted until 03/20/13 to respond to the motion and was warned that his failure to respond could be construed as an aba ndonment of the litigation. There has been no response to the motion to dismiss. It appears that plaintiff has abandoned the litigation. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 03/22/2013. (dh1)

Download PDF
Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.