McDougald v. Bear et al, No. 1:2018cv00498 - Document 9 (S.D. Ohio 2019)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING Report and Recommendations (Docs. 3, 6); Plaintiff's objections (Docs. 4, 7) are OVERRULED; and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/27/19. (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McDougald v. Bear et al Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JERONE MCDOUGALD, Plaintiff, vs. SHANNON BEAR, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : Case No. 1:18-cv-498 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docs. 3, 6) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and submitted a Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff be Ordered to pay the full $400.00 filing fee within 30 days, and a Supplemental Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (Docs. 3, 6). Plaintiff objected to both Reports and Recommendations (Docs. 4, 7). 1 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all 1 Plaintiffs’ objections lack merit. Plaintiff does not set forth any evidence or authority to rebut the Magistrate Judge’s proper conclusion that Plaintiff is prohibited by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) from proceeding in forma pauperis in this case because three of his prior complaints were dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and because he has not established particular facts showing that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Dockets.Justia.com of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that the Reports and Recommendations should be and are hereby adopted in their entirety. Accordingly: 1. The Reports and Recommendations (Docs. 3, 6) are ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s objections (Docs. 4, 7) are OVERRULED; 3. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5) is DENIED; 4. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the full $400.00 filing fee ($350 filing fee plus $50 administrative fee) required to commence this action within thirty (30) days. Failure to pay the full $400.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days will result in the dismissal of this action; and 5. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 2/27/19 s/ Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
