United States of America v. David et al
Filing
25
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE in favor of United States of America against Kenneth M. David and Elliot Jablonsky AFFIRMING Orders of Judgment (Docs 12 , 24 ). (mr1)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:12-CV-549
Judge Timothy S. Black
-vsKENNETH M. DAVID, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________________________
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
_______________________________________________
[ ] Jury Verdict: This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues
have been tried and the Jury has rendered its verdict.
[X]
Decision by Court:
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
(1) that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment as to Kenneth M. David (Doc. 8) is
GRANTED; that Default Judgment is entered in favor the United States and against
Kenneth M. David, personally, for the unpaid assessed balance of trust fund recovery
penalty taxes and related interest and penalties for a total amount due under this
Judgment, as of December 17, 2012, of $428,055.49, plus additional interest pursuant
to 26 U.S.C. § 6601, 6621 and 6622 and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c) accruing after December
17, 2012 until paid; and,
(2) that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment as to Elliot Jablonsky (Doc 23) is
GRANTED; that Default Judgment is entered in favor of the United States and against
Elliot Jablonsky, personally, for the unpaid assessed balance of trust fund recovery
penalty taxes and related interest and penalties for a total amount due under this
Judgment, as of September 16, 2013, of $417,192.50, plus additional interest pursuant
to 26 U.S.C. § 6601, 6621 and 6622 and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c) accruing after September
16, 2013 until paid: and,
(3) the case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.
Date: 10/16/2013
JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK
By: s/ M. Rogers
Deputy Clerk
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
