Scott v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 10/21/13. IT IS ORDERED that the 7 Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the petitioners 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be, and it hereby is, dismissed with prejudice. (eh)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv118 (WOB-SKB)
QUINTIN SCOTT
VS.
PETITIONER
ORDER
WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
RESPONDENT
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation (Doc. #8), and there being no
objections filed, despite two lengthy extensions thereto, and
the Court being sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #8)
be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and
conclusions of law of this Court; that the petitioner’s petition
for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 (Doc. #1)
be, and it hereby is, dismissed with prejudice; that no
certificate of appealability shall be issued with respect to the
claims alleged herein; with respect to any application by
petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the Court
certifies that any appeal would not be taken in “good faith,”
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3). A separate Judgment
shall enter concurrently herewith.
This 21st day of October, 2013.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
