Nichols v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, No. 1:2010cv00944 - Document 30 (S.D. Ohio 2011)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 27 Pro Se Motion for Relief from the Order of the Court Pursuant to FRCP 60(a)(b)(4)(6); denying 23 Pro Se Motion for a Rule NISI. The Court reiterates that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the Court's do cket for want of prosecution. Pursuant to the Court's authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), the Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of Court (1) to refuse for filing any further documents by Petitioner except for a noticeof appeal from this Opin ion and (2) to return to Petitioner, without filing, any such documents presented. Unless directed to the contrary by the Court of Appeals, this Court will entertain no further filings by Petitioner in this matter. Finally, the Court DECLINES to iss ue a certificate of appealability and CERTIFIES that any appeal of this order will not be taken in good faith, and any application to appeal in forma pauperis will be DENIED. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 8/23/2011. (km1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2011: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (km1).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.