Bruce v. Sheldon et al, No. 3:2014cv00834 - Document 26 (N.D. Ohio 2015)

Court Description: Judgment Entry. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 11), is granted. Bruce's motions for a preliminary injunction, (Doc. No. 4 and Doc. No. 17), are denied. Bruce's motion to amend his complaint, (Doc. No. 3), and the Defendants' motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 8), are denied as moot. Bruce's complaint is dismissed for failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies. re 25 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 8/17/2015. (SG,D)

Download PDF
Bruce v. Sheldon et al Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Darrell W. Bruce, Case No. 3:14-cv-00834 Plaintiff v. JUDGMENT ENTRY Edward Sheldon, et al., Defendants For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously, the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 11), is granted. Bruce’s motions for a preliminary injunction, (Doc. No. 4 and Doc. No. 17), are denied. Bruce’s motion to amend his complaint, (Doc. No. 3), and the Defendants’ motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 8), are denied as moot. Bruce’s complaint is dismissed for failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.