Echols v. Sloan, No. 1:2017cv00859 - Document 16 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

Court Description: Judgment Entry: For the reasons set forth in the Court's memorandum opinion and order, the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 13 ) is ACCEPTED and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1 ) is DISMIS SED. Further, for the same reasons, the Court CERTIFIES that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Sara Lioi on 12/9/2019. (D,N)

Download PDF

Echols v. Sloan Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM ECHOLS, PETITIONER, vs. BRIGHAM SLOAN, Warden, RESPONDENT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17CV859 JUDGE SARA LIOI JUDGMENT ENTRY For the reasons set forth in the contemporaneously filed memorandum opinion and order, the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 13) is ACCEPTED and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED. Further, for the same reasons, the Court CERTIFIES that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 9, 2019 HONORABLE SARA LIOI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.