Schneider v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, No. 1:2016cv02502 - Document 16 (N.D. Ohio 2017)
Court Description: Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/25/17. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and affirms the Commissioner's decision. (Related Docs. 1 and 15 ) (D,MA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Schneider v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ------------------------------------------------------: PETER SCHNEIDER, : : Plaintiff, : : vs. : : NANCY A. BERRYHILL, : Acting Commissioner of Social Security, : : Defendant. : : ------------------------------------------------------- Doc. 16 CASE NO. 1:16-CV-02502 OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Doc. No. 1] JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Plaintiff Peter Schneider challenges the final decision of Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, denying his applications for Period of Disability and Disability Insurance Benefits, under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423 et seq.1 Under Local Rule 72.2, the Court referred the petition to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg for a Report and Recommendation. On August 16, 2017, Magistrate Judge Greenberg issued a report recommending that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s final decision.2 The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s decision. The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection.3 1 Doc. 1. Doc. 15. 3 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 2 Dockets.Justia.com Case No. 1:16-cv-02502 Gwin, J. Parties must file any objections to a Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of service.4 Failure to object within that time waives a party’s right to appeal the magistrate judge’s recommendation.5 Absent objection, a district court may adopt the magistrate judge’s report without review.6 In this case, neither party objected to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS in whole Magistrate Judge Greenberg’s Report and Recommendation and incorporates it fully herein by reference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 25, 2017 s/ James S. Gwin JAMES S. GWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Id. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 145 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981). 6 Thomas, 474 U.S. at 149. 5 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
