Carter Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2016cv00524 - Document 15 (N.D. Ohio 2016)

Court Description: Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting the parties' 14 Joint Motion to Remand to the Commissioner for further proceedings and issuance of a new decision. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 9/28/2016. (JLG)

Download PDF
Carter Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 15 PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM CARTER, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:16CV524 JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving ECF No. 14] An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Plaintiff William Carter, Jr.’s applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits after a hearing in the above-captioned case. That decision became the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security when the Appeals Council denied the request to review the ALJ’s decision. The claimant sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, and the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). Pending is parties’ Joint Motion to Remand (ECF No. 14) to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1 The parties 1 Sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), (continued...) Dockets.Justia.com (1:16CV524) stipulate and petition the Court to remand the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings and issuance of a new decision. For good cause shown, the motion is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 28, 2016 Date 1 /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge (...continued) states: The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.