Zickes v. Cuyahoga County et al, No. 1:2015cv01865 - Document 34 (N.D. Ohio 2016)
Court Description: Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/10/16 denying as moot the motion to dismiss of defendant Lucy Rodriguez for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 11 ) (D,MA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Zickes v. Cuyahoga County et al UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ------------------------------------------------------: JOSEPH ZICKES, : : Plaintiff, : : vs. : : CUYAHOGA COUNTY et al., : : Defendants. : : ------------------------------------------------------- Doc. 34 CASE NO. 1:15-CV-1865 OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Doc. 11] JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: On September 11, 2015, Plaintiff Joseph Zickes filed a complaint alleging violations of his rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.1 Plaintiff Zickes named Bryan Smith, Michael Carroll, Lucy Rodriguez, Cuyahoga County, and the Cuyahoga County Executive as defendants. On September 29, 2015, Lucy Rodriguez filed a motion to be dismissed as a party. 2 Plaintiff Zickes filed an amended complaint on November, 3, 2015. Lucy Rodriguez then filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings on November 17, 2015. 3 Because Rodriguez filed her motion to dismiss before Zickes filed his amended complaint and because Rodriguez has now filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, this Court DENIES as MOOT Rodriguez’ motion to dismiss. Dated: March 10, 2016 s/ James S. Gwin JAMES S. GWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. 1. Doc. 11. 3 Doc. 22. 2 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
