Breedlove v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2015cv00039 - Document 26 (N.D. Ohio 2016)

Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order awarding plaintiff $3,500.00 in attorney fees(Related Docs # 20 , 25 ). Magistrate Judge Nancy A. Vecchiarelli 1/20/16(C,KA)

Download PDF
Breedlove v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GARY BREEDLOVE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: 1:15-CV-39 MAGISTRATE JUDGE NANCY A. VECCHIARELLI MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Doc. No. 20) This case is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge by the consent of the parties. (Doc. No. 15.) On December 22, 2015, Plaintiff, Gary Breedlove (“Plaintiff”), through his attorney, Paulette Balin, filed a motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the am ount of $4,446.76. (Application for Attorney Fees (“EAJA Application”), Doc. No. 20.) The Commissioner did not file an opposition to the EAJA Motion. On January 19, 2016, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation to an Award of Fees under the EAJA in the amount of $3,500.00. (Doc. No. 25.) The Court finds the stipulated amount to be reasonable. Therefore, the Court awards Plaintiff $3,500.00 in attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA. This award shall satisfy all of Plaintiff’s claims for fees and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, any fees paid belong to Plaintiff and not her attorney and can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the United States. If counsel for the parties can verify that Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debts to Dockets.Justia.com the United States that are subject to offset, Defendant shall direct that the award be made payable to Plaintiff’s counsel subject to the assignment signed by Plaintiff and her counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Nancy A. Vecchiarelli U.S. Magistrate Judge Date: January 20, 2016 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.