MRI Software LLC v. Lynx Systems Inc., No. 1:2012cv01082 - Document 302 (N.D. Ohio 2016)
Court Description: Opinion and Order. The Court finds that under the unambiguous provisions of Section 10.7 of the 2002 Agreement, the one-year limitation clause is not absurd and is enforceable. The Court further finds it applies to both claims and countercla ims. Opinion to follow. The Court denies both Motions for Sanctions (Related doc #'s 180 , 188 ) and corresponding Motions in Limine (Related doc #'s 249 , 255 ) regarding MRI's failure to timely produce the five source codes and spreadsheet. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/23/2016. (H,CM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
MRI Software LLC v. Lynx Systems Inc. Doc. 302 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MRI SOFTWARE, LLC., Plaintiff, Vs. LYNX SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.1:12CV1082 JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, J: In light of the Motions, Briefs, Replies and oral arguments the Court, upon reconsideration, finds that under the unambiguous provisions of Section 10.7 of the 2002 Agreement, the one-year limitation clause is not absurd and is enforceable. The Court further finds it applies to both claims and counterclaims. Opinion to follow. The Court further denies both Motions for Sanctions and corresponding Motions in Limine regarding MRI’s failure to timely produce the five source codes and spreadsheet. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO United States District Judge Dated: November 23, 2016 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
