1982 Western District of North Carolina U.S. Federal District Court Case Law

Alexander v. Hill
Date: December 20, 1982
Citation: 553 F. Supp. 1261
Docket Number: C-C-74-183-M
Simpson v. Garrison
Date: November 30, 1982
Citation: 551 F. Supp. 618
Docket Number: C-C-80-389-P
Hoke v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSP. AUTH., INC.
Date: November 16, 1982
Citation: 550 F. Supp. 1276
Docket Number: C-C-74-044-M
Alexander v. Hill
Date: November 4, 1982
Citation: 549 F. Supp. 1355
Docket Number: C-C-74-183-M
Spagnuolo v. Whirlpool Corp.
Date: November 2, 1982
Citation: 550 F. Supp. 432
Docket Number: C-C-78-107-M
Spagnuolo v. Whirlpool Corp.
Date: September 27, 1982
Citation: 548 F. Supp. 104
Docket Number: C-C-78-107-M
Shumate v. Harris
Date: August 13, 1982
Citation: 544 F. Supp. 779
Docket Number: C-C-79-378-M
Lilly v. Harris-Teeter Supermarket
Date: July 13, 1982
Citation: 545 F. Supp. 686
Docket Numbers: C-C-76-191, C-C-79-130, C-C-79-137
RAINTREE HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. City of Charlotte
Date: July 13, 1982
Citation: 543 F. Supp. 625
Docket Numbers: C-C-81-553-M, C-C-82-325-M
Parnell v. Waldrep
Date: May 20, 1982
Citation: 538 F. Supp. 1203
Docket Numbers: C-C-79-136, C-C-79-365
Greene v. Whirlpool Corp.
Date: May 7, 1982
Citation: 538 F. Supp. 352
Docket Number: C-C-79-329-M
Hudson v. Charlotte Country Club, Inc.
Date: April 1, 1982
Citation: 535 F. Supp. 313
Docket Number: C-C-80-0353-P
Cook v. Town of Davidson
Date: March 30, 1982
Citation: 534 F. Supp. 808
Docket Number: C-C-81-435-P
Martin v. Smith
Date: March 30, 1982
Citation: 534 F. Supp. 804
Docket Number: C-C-81-112-M
Hopkins v. FMC Corp.
Date: March 25, 1982
Citation: 535 F. Supp. 235
Docket Number: C-C-79-91-P
Sweezy v. Garrison
Date: February 28, 1982
Citation: 554 F. Supp. 481
Docket Number: A-C-81-109
Harvey v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n
Date: February 9, 1982
Citation: 533 F. Supp. 949
Docket Number: C-C-78-0081-P
IREDELL MEM. HOSPITAL, INC. v. Schweiker
Date: January 7, 1982
Citation: 535 F. Supp. 795
Docket Number: ST-C-81-52

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.