Larrimore v. State of North Carolina, No. 7:2009cv00037 - Document 14 (E.D.N.C. 2009)
Court Description: OPINION by USCA: No reversible error found and district court's ruling affirmed. Signed on 9/1/2009. (Mears, C.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Case: 09-1524 Document: 22 Date Filed: 09/01/2009 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1524 TIMOTHY BRYAN LARRIMORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ALL JUDGES; ALL DISTRICT ATTORNEYS; ALL LAWYERS; ALL MAGISTRATES; ALL AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONS; ALL STATE BARS; ALL JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSIONS; ALL LOCAL BARS; ALL FEDERAL COURT JUDGES; ALL FEDERAL COURT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS; ALL FEDERAL COURT MAGISTRATES; ALL MASONIC LODGES; ALL SHERIFFS; ALL POLICE OFFICERS; ALL BAILIFFS; ALL DEPUTIES; ALL LAW COLLEGES; ALL LAW ENFORCEMENTS; ALL NORTH CAROLINA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MEMBERS; ALL NORTH CAROLINA SENATE MEMBERS; ALL FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION EMPLOYEES; ALL STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION EMPLOYEES; ALL BAR ASSOCIATIONS; ALL COUNTY GOVERNMENTS; ALL COUNTY EMPLOYEES; ALL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; ALL MAYORS; ALL CITY GOVERNMENTS; ALL TOWN GOVERNMENTS; ALL COUNTY ATTORNEYS; ALL CITY ATTORNEYS; ALL ELECTED GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, CITY, TOWNS; ALL ELECTED GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS; ALL COLLEGE SORORITIES; ALL CLUBS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00037-D) Submitted: August 26, 2009 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: September 1, 2009 and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Case: 09-1524 Document: 22 Date Filed: 09/01/2009 Page: 2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Bryan Larrimore, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Case: 09-1524 Document: 22 Date Filed: 09/01/2009 Page: 3 PER CURIAM: Timothy Bryan Larrimore appeals the district court s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous monetary sanctions and a prefiling injunction. the record and find no reversible error. and imposing We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Larrimore v. North Carolina, No. 7:09-cv-00037-D (E.D.N.C. April 2, 2009). We deny Larrimore s pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
