Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. et al v. Like-Mathews, No. 5:2008cv00115 - Document 15 (E.D.N.C. 2008)
Court Description: DECISION AND MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 6 MOTIONS to Dismiss, Strike Plaintiff's Affidavit and Quash Subpoena filed by John Doe. It is RECOMMENDED that defendant's motions to dismiss and strike be DENIED. It is ORDERED that: (1) d efendant's motion to quash is DENIED; (2) the subpoena served on NCSU shall be deemed to be limited to the documents set out in the court's 15 May 2008 order, nothwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the subpoena; and (3) the Clerk shall mail a copy of this Decision and Memorandum and Recommendation to: David T. Drooz, Esq., Senior Associate General Counsel, North Carolina State University, Holladay Hall 301, Campus Box 7008, Raleigh, NC 27695. Signed by USMJ James E. Gates on 09/26/08. Cys served. (Attachments: # 1 M&R Notice) (Baker, C.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO. 5:08-CV-115-FL ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., a Delaware Corporation; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE Attached to this notice is a memorandum and recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge in this action that has been entered on the records of this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง636(b)(1)(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2)-(3), and Local Civil Rule 72.4(b), EDNC. Rule 72(b) provides as follows: (2) Objections. Within 10 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy. Unless the district judge orders otherwise, the objecting party must promptly arrange for transcribing the record, or whatever portions of it the parties agree to or the magistrate judge considers sufficient. (3) Resolving Objections. The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions. You are hereby notified that unless written objections in accordance with this rule are filed within 10 days after receipt of this memorandum and recommendation, you will have waived the right to further consideration of these issues by the district judge, and an appropriate order based on the memorandum and recommendation will be entered. Furthermore, failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendation set forth by the magistrate judge may result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this court based on such findings and recommendations. See Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985). Date Filed: 09/26/2008 /s/ DENNIS P. IAVARONE CLERK OF COURT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
