Maldonado v. Krawczyk et al, No. 6:2018cv06021 - Document 50 (W.D.N.Y. 2023)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief 44 45 are denied; plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 41 is denied, without prejudice. It is plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/27/2023. (KAH)This was mailed to: Plaintiff Edwin Maldonado.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Maldonado v. Krawczyk et al Doc. 50 Case 6:18-cv-06021-DGL-MWP Document 50 Filed 06/27/23 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___________________________________________ EDWIN MALDONADO, DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, 18-CV-6021DGL v. J. KRAWCZYK, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________________ Plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. #44, #45), are denied. Plaintiff has not met the standard for such relief in this circuit. See Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008); Wright v. Giuliani, 230 F.3d 543, 547 (2000). Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. #41) is likewise denied, without prejudice. It is plaintiff’s responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654. IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________________ DAVID G. LARIMER United States District Judge Dated: Rochester, New York June 27, 2023. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
