Grace v. Alvarado et al, No. 7:2021cv03578 - Document 58 (S.D.N.Y. 2024)
Court Description: OPINION & ORDER re: 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Alexander Alvarado. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion, (ECF No. 46), enter judgment for Defendant, and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/29/2024) (mml) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com OPINION & ORDER Pro Se Plaintiff Counsel for Defendant I. BACKGROUND Grace v. Alvarado et al Doc. 58 See generally Facts see id. See, e.g. Johnson v. City of N.Y. pro se pro se see Id. pro se Wali v. One Source Co. pro se pro se Id. Id. see . Id. see sic sic sic sic see see Id. Id. see id id. Procedural History see See id. II. LEGAL STANDARD Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. Id. Id. Holcomb v. Iona Coll. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Anderson Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. Fujitsu Ltd. v. Fed. Express Corp. Id. see Major League Baseball Props., Inc. v. Salvino Inc. pro se Tracy v. Freshwater Jackson v. Fed. Express pro se See Vt. Teddy Bear Co. v. 1-800 Beargram Co. Buckley v. County of Suffolk III. DISCUSSION Id. Id. Dolan v. Connolly see Graham v. Henderson Colon v. Coughlin, abrogated on other grounds by Tangreti v. Bachmann Brandon v. Kinter Mount Healthy School District v. Doyle Graham Id. Mount Healthy Id. Vidal v. Valentin i.e. Id. see Morgan v. Dzurenda Gayle v. Gonyea per curiam see Hynes v. Squillace, Lowrance v. Achtyl, Lowrance Nicholas v. Tucker aff’d Id. See Gill v. Pidlypchak Franco v. Kelly Morgan Pledger v. Hudson See Tafari v. McCarthy Jackson v. Onondaga County Jermosen v. Coughlin see See Graham See Bartley v. Collins Treizon Lopez v. Semple Gilmore v. Blair report and recommendation adopted Vidal see Berry v. Tremblay report and recommendation adopted See e.g. Marshall v. Griffin Lugo v. Van Orden Keesh v. Goord Gill see Vidal Graham Morgan Bartley Gayle Goord See, e.g. King v. McIntyre see Holland v. Murray v. Nephew Roseboro v. Gillespie Battice v. Phillip IV. CONCLUSION SO ORDERED. See Collins v. Goord Bartley
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
