Haft v. General Electric Company, et al, No. 1:2021cv00506 - Document 136 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER granting 134 MOTION for Thomas A. Pacheco to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26788883. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. filed by Asher Haft, Cheryl Jones, Robert Fisher. The motion of Thomas A. Pacheco for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is GRANTED. As further set forth by this Order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis on 10/13/2022) (tg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Haft v. General Electric Company, et al Doc. 136 Case 1:21-cv-00506-GHW-JW Document 136 Filed 10/13/22 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ASHER HAFT, ROBERT FISHER, and CHERYL JONES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-00506-GHW Plaintiffs, v. HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. d/b/a GE APPLIANCES, Defendants. __________________________________/ MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF ATTORNEY THOMAS A. PACHECO Pursuant to Rule 1.3 of the Local Rules of the United States Courts for the Southern District of New York, Thomas A. Pacheco hereby moves this Court for an Order for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to appear as counsel for Asher Haft, Robert Fisher, and Cheryl Jones (“Plaintiffs”) in the above-captioned action. I am a member in good standing of the bars of the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia and there are no pending disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court. I have never been convicted of a felony. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court. I have attached the affidavit pursuant to Local Rule 1.3. Dated: October 7, 2022 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Thomas A. Pacheco Thomas A. Pacheco MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN PLLC Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:21-cv-00506-GHW-JW Document 136 Filed 10/13/22 Page 2 of 9 15453 Indianola Drive Derwood, MD 20855 T: (212) 946-9305 tpacheco@milberg.com Attorney for Plaintiffs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 7th day of October 2022, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing document to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent notification of such filing to all counsel of record by electronic means. [x] Pursuant to 28 USC Section 1746(2), I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 7, 2022. /s/ Thomas Pacheco Case 1:21-cv-00506-GHW-JW Document 136 Filed 10/13/22 Page 3 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ASHER HAFT, ROBERT FISHER, AND CHERYL JONES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:21-cv-00506 Plaintiffs, v. HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. d/b/a GE APPLIANCES, Defendant. ____________________________________ AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS A. PACHECO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE I, Thomas A. Pacheco, being duly sworn and on oath can competently testify to the following facts from my personal knowledge: 1. I have been retained to represent Plaintiffs Asher Haft, Robert Fisher, and Cheryl Jones, in this cause of action. 2. I am not a resident of the State of New York. 3. I am in good standing of the bars of the State of Maryland (the Court of Appeals of Maryland) and the District of Columbia (the District of Columbia Court of Appeals). 4. There are no pending disciplinary actions against me. 5. I have not been subject to any disciplinary proceedings. 6. I have not been subject to any suspension proceedings. 7. I have not been subject to any disbarment proceedings. 8. I have not been subject to any criminal charges or proceedings. 9. I have never been convicted of a felony. Case 1:21-cv-00506-GHW-JW Document 136 Filed 10/13/22 Page 4 of 9 Case 1:21-cv-00506-GHW-JW Document 136 Filed 10/13/22 Page 5 of 9 Case 1:21-cv-00506-GHW-JW Document 136 Filed 10/13/22 Page 6 of 9 Case 1:21-cv-00506-GHW-JW Document 136 Filed 10/13/22 Page 7 of 9 On behalf of JULIO A. CASTILLO, Clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the District of Columbia Bar does hereby certify that Thomas Pacheco was duly qualified and admitted on November 12, 2018 as an attorney and counselor entitled to practice before this Court; and is, on the date indicated below, an Active member in good standing of this Bar. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of this Court at the City of Washington, D.C., on October 06, 2022. JULIO A. CASTILLO Clerk of the Court Issued By: David Chu - Director, Membership District of Columbia Bar Membership For questions or concerns, please contact the D.C. Bar Membership Office at 202-626-3475 or email memberservices@dcbar.org. Case 1:21-cv-00506-GHW-JW Document 136 Filed 10/13/22 Page 8 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ASHER HAFT, ROBERT FISHER, and CHERYL JONES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-00506-GHW Plaintiffs, v. HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC. d/b/a GE APPLIANCES, Defendants. __________________________________/ The motion of Thomas A. Pacheco for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the abovecaptioned action is GRANTED. Applicant has declared that he is a member in good standing of the bar of the states of Maryland and the District of Columbia and that his contact information is as follows: Applicant’s Name: Thomas Pacheco Firm Name: Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC Address: 15453 Indianola Drive City/State/Zip: Derwood, MD 20855 Telephone/Fax: (212) 946-9305 Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Plaintiffs in the above captioned action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New Case 1:21-cv-00506-GHW-JW Document 136 Filed 10/13/22 Page 9 of 9 York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. Dated: 10/13/2022 __ ___________ __ _________ ____ __ ________ __ _____ __ __ ______ ___ ________________________________ U Un ited States it Staates District/Magistrate Judg United Judge _ 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
