Arcesium LLC v. Advent Software, Inc. et al, No. 1:2020cv04389 - Document 113 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT granting 111 Motion for Judgment. On March 31, 2021, this Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint and provided Plaintiff with 30 days to move for leave to file an amended compl aint, if it wished to do so. ECF No. 109. Plaintiff did not make such a motion by the April 30, 2021 deadline set by this Court. THEREFORE, this Court hereby orders 1. Plaintiff's federal antitrust claims (Counts I, II, III, and IV) are dismiss ed with prejudice. 2. Plaintiff's remaining state law claims (Counts V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, and X) are dismissed without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment in accordance with the above. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 5/6/2021) (nb) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Arcesium LLC v. Advent Software, Inc. et al Doc. 113 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------- x : ARCESIUM LLC, : : Plaintiff, : v. : : ADVENT SOFTWARE, INC. and SS&C : TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC., : : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------- x Case No: 1:20-cv-04389 (MKV) Hon. Mary Kay Vyskocil Magistrate Judge Hon. Stewart D. Aaron ORDER FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT On March 31, 2021, this Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint and provided Plaintiff with 30 days to move for leave to file an amended complaint, if it wished to do so. ECF No. 109. Plaintiff did not make such a motion by the April 30, 2021 deadline set by this Court. THEREFORE, this Court hereby orders 1. Plaintiff’s federal antitrust claims (Counts I, II, III, and IV) are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Plaintiff’s remaining state law claims (Counts V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, and X) are dismissed without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment in accordance with the above. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0D\ 1HZ <RUN 1< _______________________________ _______ ___ __________ _ ______ __ _ __ _ ______ ___ Hon. Maary Kay Vyyskocil ill Hon. Mary Kay Vyskocil 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LLVWU VWWULFW -XGJH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LVWULFW -XGJH Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
