Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company et al, No. 1:2018cv11386 - Document 756 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER: granting 741 Letter Motion to Seal; denying 742 Motion for Reconsideration re 741 LETTER MOTION to Seal Memorandum in Support of Motion for Reconsideration. addressed to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker from Esha Bandyopadhyay d ated August 21, 2023. filed by Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited, 742 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 738 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited. As discussed at the August 22, 2023 Case Management Conference: Motion for Reconsideration and related Motion to Seal: For the reasons discussed at the conference, Spectrum's motion for reconsideration at ECF No. 742 is DENIED. The Court refers the parties to the conference transcript. Spectrum's motion to se al its memorandum of law in support of the motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 741) is GRANTED as narrowly tailored to protect sensitive information in accordance with the principles articulated in Lugosch v.Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006), and its progeny. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos 741 and 742. Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge: The parties are reminded that they can consent to my jurisdiction for purp oses of the pending motion to dismiss, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c). If the parties so consent, the undersigned will resolve the motion as an Opinion and Order rather than a Report and Recommendation, and the Order would be appealable directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. and as set forth herein. This Order is not meant to interfere in any way with the parties' absolute right to decision by a United States District Judge but is merely an attempt at preserving scarce judicial resources and reminding the parties of their option pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 8/23/2023) (ama)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company et al Doc. 756 Case 1:18-cv-11386-VSB-KHP Document 756 Filed 08/23/23 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 8/23/2023 SPECTRUM DYNAMICS MEDICAL LIMITED, ORDER Plaintiff, 18-CV-11386 (VSB) (KHP) -againstGENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al., Defendants. KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: As discussed at the August 22, 2023 Case Management Conference: Motion for Reconsideration and related Motion to Seal: For the reasons discussed at the conference, Spectrum’s motion for reconsideration at ECF No. 742 is DENIED. The Court refers the parties to the conference transcript. Spectrum’s motion to seal its memorandum of law in support of the motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 741) is GRANTED as narrowly tailored to protect sensitive information in accordance with the principles articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006), and its progeny. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos 741 and 742. Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge: The parties are reminded that they can consent to my jurisdiction for purposes of the pending motion to dismiss, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). If the parties so consent, the undersigned will resolve the motion as an Opinion and Order rather than a Report and Recommendation, and the Order would be appealable directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. This option would likely increase efficiency and result in a sooner resolution of the issue, however there will be no adverse consequences if the parties withhold their consent. The “Consent to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge On a Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:18-cv-11386-VSB-KHP Document 756 Filed 08/23/23 Page 2 of 2 Specific Motion” form is available on the Court’s website at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/consent-proceed-us-magistrate-judge-specific-motion. In the event the parties jointly consent to conduct all proceedings before the Undersigned, including dispositive motions and a jury trial, they should complete the “Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge” form available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/consent-proceed-us-magistrate-judge. This Order is not meant to interfere in any way with the parties’ absolute right to decision by a United States District Judge but is merely an attempt at preserving scarce judicial resources and reminding the parties of their option pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). SO ORDERED. Dated: August 23, 2023 New York, NY ________________________________ KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
