Zurich American Insurance Company v. Harleysville Insurance Co. et al, No. 1:2015cv03270 - Document 44 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER re: 33 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Harleysville Insurance Co., 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Zurich American Insurance Company, 32 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment < /i> filed by Harleysville Insurance Co. For the foregoing reasons, Zurich's summary judgment motion is granted in part and Harleysville's summary judgment motion is granted. Specifically, this Court finds that (1) both Harle ysville and Scottsdale have a duty to defend and indemnify FJ Sciame, and (2) the Scottsdale Policy provides the primary coverage to FI Sciame, with the Harleysville and Zurich Policies providing the first and second layers of excess coverage, respectively. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this case. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 7/7/2016) (mro)

Download PDF
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Harleysville Insurance Co. et al Doc. 44 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.