Concord Associates, L.P. et al v. Entertainment Properties Trust et al, No. 1:2012cv01667 - Document 82 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

Court Description: OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs' antitrust claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state law claims and therefore DISMISSES those claims withou t prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions (Docs. 41, 44) and close this case. (This Order was previously filed under seal in envelope #69 and unsealed on 4/9/2014.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/18/2013) (mro)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.