NML Capital, Ltd. v. Rep. of Argentina, No. 1:2003cv08845 - Document 475 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

Court Description: OPINION re: (448 in 1:05-cv-02434-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (433) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML Capital, Ltd., (196 in 1:09-cv-01707-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (179) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML Capital, Ltd., (329 in 1:08-cv-02541-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (316) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML Capital, Ltd., (447 in 1:03-cv-08845-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (434) Memorandum & Opinion,, filed by NML Capital, Ltd., (327 in 1:08-cv-03302-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (313) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML C apital, Ltd., (305 in 1:07-cv-06563-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (292) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML Capital, Ltd., (346 in 1:08-cv-06978-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (327) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML Capital, Ltd., (369 in 1:06-cv-06466-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (354) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML Capital, Ltd., (197 in 1:09-cv-01708-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (180) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML Capital, Ltd., (317 in 1:07-cv-01910-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (304) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML C apital, Ltd., (320 in 1:07-cv-02690-TPG) MOTION to Vacate (306) Memorandum & Opinion, filed by NML Capital, Ltd. For essentially the same reasons stated at the hearing held on August 30, 2011, the court denies plaintiff's current motion. This opinion resolves the motion listed as document number 447 in case 03 Civ. 8845, as well as the same motion in the related cases. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 8/14/2012) (lmb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------x OPINION NML CAPITAL, LTD., Plaintiff, - againstTHE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Defendant. 03 05 06 07 07 07 08 08 08 09 09 Civ. Civ. Civ. Civ. Civ. Civ. Civ. Civ. Civ. Civ. Civ. 8845 (TPG) 2434 (TPG) 6466 (TPG) 1910 (TPG) 2690 (TPG) 6563 (TPG) 2541 (TPG) 3302 (TPG) 6978 (TPG) 1707 (TPG) 1708 (TPG) ---------------------------------------------x On May 6, 2011, NML Capital, Ltd. ("NML") moved for reconsideration of the court's April 22,2011 opinion. The court held a hearing on August 30, 2011, in part to discuss the motion for reconsideration. At that hearing, the court denied the motion. NML has now moved to vacate the April 22, 2011 opinion. For essentially the same reasons stated at the hearing held on August 30,2011, the court denies plaintiff's current motion. This opinion resolves the motion listed as document number 447 in case 03 Civ. 8845, as well as the same motion in the related cases. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York August 14, 2012 ... USOCSDNY DOCUfvfENT ELECTRO~lCALIY Fll..ED DOC IDATE#:FI-LE-'lD-:-q'"'l"'/-'~""'I-2.0-I-2......,

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.