Fabian v. DuBrey, et al., No. 9:2016cv00022 - Document 30 (N.D.N.Y 2017)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 29 ] for the reasons stated therein. Defendant Craig DuBrey's motion for summary judgment [dkt. # 27 ] is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 7/12/17. {order served via regular mail and via certified mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Fabian v. DuBrey, et al. Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________ ANTHONY FABIAN, Plaintiff, v. 9:16-CV-00022 DUBREY, et al., Defendants. ________________________________________ THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge DECISION & ORDER I. INTRODUCTION This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Dancks’ June 13, 2017 Report-Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 29] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. II. DISCUSSION After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report- Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack f or plain error or manifest injustice. III. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order [dkt. # 29] for the reasons stated therein. Defendant Craig DuBrey’s motion for summary judgment 1 Dockets.Justia.com [dkt. # 27] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 12, 2017 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
