-DEP Harmon v. Hammill et al, No. 9:2010cv01290 - Document 30 (N.D.N.Y 2011)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 28 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to notify the Court of any change of address. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 9/19/11. (Served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CUSHAAWN HARMON, Plaintiff, -against- 9:10-CV-01290 (LEK/DEP) J. HAMMILL, Sergeant; D. LaCLAIR, Superintendent ; GETTMAN, Sergeant; C. VOLPE, Nurse; JANE DOE, Nurse; T. DUMAS; E. BJORK, Lieutenant; R. BRAND, Officer; FLETCHER, Sergeant; and JOHN DOE, Officer, Defendants. ______________________________________ DECISION and ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 25, 2011, by the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 28). Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge s Report-Recommendation, the party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Magistrate Judge Peebles ReportRecommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 28) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to notify the Court of any change of address; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 19, 2011 Albany, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
