Valentine v. Herron et al, No. 9:2008cv00901 - Document 15 (N.D.N.Y 2009)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY. ORDERED, that Respondents' 9 10 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. ORDERED, that Petitioner's Petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 5/22/09. (Order served on non-ecf party by regular mail) (alh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DELROY VALENTINE, Petitioner, -against- 9:08-CV-0901 (LEK/ GJD) MARTIN HERRON, Chief Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention, et al., Respondents. DECISION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on May 6, 2009 by the Honorable Gustave J. DiBianco, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 13). Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge s Report-Recommendation, the party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, FED . R. CIV . P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge DiBianco s Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further 1 ORDERED, that the Respondents Motion to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 9, 10) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Petitioner s Petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 22, 2009 Albany, New York 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
