Douglas v. Skellie et al, No. 9:2007cv00080 - Document 29 (N.D.N.Y 2009)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER adopting in whole the 28 Report and Recommendations. ORDERD, that the 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the complaint DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/1/09. (Order served on Plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------JOSEPH DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, vs 9:07-CV-80 D. SKELLIE, et al., Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: JOSEPH DOUGLAS 99-A-0144 Plaintiff, pro se Southport Correctional Facility P.O. Box 2000 Pine City, NY 14871 HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendants The Capitol Albany, NY 12224-0341 KRISTA A. ROCK, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Plaintiff brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 11, 2009, the Honorable Gustave J. DiBianco, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation, that defendants motion for summary judgment be granted, and the complaint be dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. Based upon a careful review of entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 1, 2009 Utica, New York. - 2 -
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
