Bradford v. City of Watertown, et al, No. 7:2014cv01017 - Document 30 (N.D.N.Y 2015)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER: Adopting the # 28 Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendant's # 23 Letter Request to dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's # 1 Complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/23/2015. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular and certified mail at the last known address of Ogdensburg Correctional Facility.] (mc)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bradford v. City of Watertown, et al Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------LAWRENCE M. BRADFORD, Plaintiff, v. 7:14-CV-1017 (DNH/TWD) CHAD FREDERICK and SHANE RYAN, POLICE OFFICERS Defendants. -------------------------------APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: LAWRENCE M. BRADFORD Plaintiff, pro se, 13-B-2878 Ogdensburg Correctional Facility One Correction Way Auburn, New York 13021 BOND SCHOENECK & KING, PPLC Attorney for Defendants One Lincoln Center Syracuse, New York 13202 SUZANNE O. GALBATO, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER Pro se plaintiff Lawrence M. Bradford filed this action against defendants alleging civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 6, 2015, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendant’s request to dismiss (ECF No. 23) be granted. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed. Dockets.Justia.com Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that 1. Defendant’s request to dismiss (ECF No. 23) without prejudice is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and 3. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 23, 2015 Utica, New York. -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
