Liggins v. City of Utica, No. 6:2014cv00446 - Document 9 (N.D.N.Y 2014)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 8 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Order and Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 8] for the reasons stated therein. The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/23/14. (tab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Liggins v. City of Utica Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________ JASON LIGGINS, Plaintiff, vs. 6:14-CV-446 CITY OF UTICA, Defendant. ________________________________________ THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge DECISION & ORDER I. INTRODUCTION This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter’s Order and Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 8] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. II. DISCUSSION After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Order and Report- Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. III. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Order and Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 8] for the reasons stated therein. The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 Dockets.Justia.com FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:December 23, 2014 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
